Review comments are in an open archive for at least five years. There are several types of endorsement which documents receive: Material has been subjected to detailed, line by line discussion and agreement. Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers is approved by Panel.
Those who go along are well rewarded, others ignored, attacked, often destroyed. Climate science has to support CO2 warming. I wonder how many of the online nutters are being paid. I suppose the oil industry could still make plastics and petrochemicals, which is a better use for a substance that required say 50 million years to form.
They reach an audience in the tens of millions that way, with no opponents able to reply. Why would they fool around in comment strings that a few hundred read, where they can be shown wrong by people who understand the science? Another institution to add to my conspiracies folder!
American Enterprise, Hoover, Heritiage, Marshall.
Heartland, Competitive Enterprise, Cato. Bill What do you have against GHGs? If you fear warming than you want to put GHGs into the atmosphere. GHGs absorb the heat energy the sun sends into our world.
What is wrong and, what concerns are very valid? Oh by the by, the site you sent me to, was slightly fraudulent. The depiction of the CO2 atom absorbing a photon and then emitting it acceding to the Law of Conservation of Momentum is false.
Some photons will even go right back the way they came.
But it does state that GHGs in the air absorb incoming and outgoing heat. OS the question is, is there more heat coming into the air or going out. The GHGs are just as absorbent of heart leaving as they are entering.
But since the sun is much hotter than the earth, the heat trapped out is much greater than the earth heat trapped in. Or in other words, about watts per meter squared is blocked out vs. Thus, the cooling effect of the GHGs is watts or so greater than the warming of the greenhouse effect.
For a warming effect to be greater than the cooling effect the earth would have to give off more heat than the sun sent in, and that is impossible.
If I said something wrong, what did I say that you disagree with? That is the Biggest lie Warmers tell. Whereas the Industrial Revolution began in the mid 19th century.N-back is a kind of mental training intended to expand your working memory (WM), and hopefully your intelligence (IQ 1)..
The theory originally went that novel 2 cognitive processes tend to overlap and seem to go through one central urbanagricultureinitiative.com it happens, WM predicts and correlates with IQ 3 and may use the same neural networks 4, suggesting that WM might be IQ 5.
Tagged directed writing, english, paper 1, spm, spm english paper 1 7 Comments.
October 12, by ideasforenglish. Directed Writing – Article. Article is by far, the least complicated essay in terms of format as it has only 2 components: 1. title. 2. writer’s name. Additional tips: 1. Imagine what an article in a newspaper or magazine. 1. 0 SPM ENGLISH FORMAT PAPER Paper 1 (/1) Paper2 (/2) SECTION QUESTION Section A Directed Writing 1 question MARK 35 * Section B4/4(4).
It’s been 8 years since Al Gore told us in January that we had only 10 years left to solve the global warming problem. In the grand tradition of prophets of doom, his prognostication is not shaping up too well still no statistically significant warming: And if you use RSS version of the.
Oct 12, · Directed Writing – Article Article is by far, the least complicated essay in terms of format as it has only 2 components: This entry was posted in Examinations & Tests and tagged article, directed writing, english, paper 1, spm, spm english paper 1.
Bookmark the permalink. As you can see, the essays are now in Paper 1 and the time allotted is 1 hour and 45 minutes. Paper 2 begins with the multiple-choice items such as graphics and short texts followed by Section B where you are required to do some information transfer.