Incompatibilism may occupy any of the nine positions except 58 or 3which last corresponds to soft determinism.
Son of the king and queen of Thebes, Oedipus was sent to be abandoned as a baby and left to die because the Oracle at Delphi told the king that Oedipus would grow up to kill him.
Instead of being left to die, a servant left Oedipus in the care of a shepherd and he was eventually adopted by the king and queen of Corinth.
Later, Oedipus consulted the same Oracle at Delphi to find out if the king and queen of Corinth were his real parents, but instead the oracle told him that he would grow up to kill his father and marry his mother. Thinking that the king and queen of Corinth were his real parents and horrified at the prophecy, Oedipus fled Corinth determined to evade his fate.
Of course, Oedipus, during his travels, ends up killing his father, the kind of Thebes, solving the riddle of the Sphinx, returning to Thebes as a hero and marrying the queen of Thebes, his mother.
After he discovers what he has done, he gouges his own eyes out and wanders blindly throughout the country. Macbeth, an Scotland nobleman, is told by three witches that he would sit on the throne of Scotland. He is baffled by this prediction since there is already a king Duncan on the throne and he has sons who would be his successors.
However, the proposed fate proves too tempting for Macbeth as he is intoxicated by the thought of becoming king and, with a not insignificant amount of prodding from his wife, Lady Macbeth, he kills Duncan in his sleep. Macbeth ascends to the throne and would have remained there comfortably if not for Macduff, another Scottish nobleman, who was suspicious of Macbeth all along.
Macduff leads an army to capture Macbeth and kills him for the crime he has committed. Obviously, there are many parallels between the two stories, but there are key differences as well. Overall, Oedipus is seen as the unfortunate figure who is labeled with a horrible fate and is doomed from the beginning.
Macbeth, however, is seen as a villain who becomes ensconced with the idea of becoming king and whose eventual fate is seen as justice.
The story of both men is dominated by symbols of destiny and fate, murder, and psychological anguish. Their differing reactions to their individual prophecies and their eventual outcomes outlines a bigger question: If not, how far can our choices take us?
The main problem with believing in fate is that, in most cases, belief in it ends up being retroactive. However, in the moment that they were dreaming of becoming a pilot, that goal was always in their head as their desired outcome. In the moment, fate or destiny does not exist because those concepts involve something happening in the next moment, not the present one.
So every outcome is preceded by causes that are outcomes of fate.
The bank robber got struck by lightning and died? The cancer survivor won the lottery? The man who was in a car accident woke up from a coma? And on it goes. We want to think that there is a reason behind every occurrence because the thought is comforting—if there is some kind of unimaginable, untouchable rationale behind the machinations of the universe, then everything becomes so much easier.
The problem with believing in free will occurs most often when something happens which begs for a label. It would seem so planned out that our natural instinct would be to say it was always meant to be.
They feared their fates so much that they let their lives be dictated by them. You can fault both equally for submitting to some kind of high power and unknowingly having a direct hand in sealing their own fate.
It was their choices that showed who they truly were—Oedipus as clever, yet fickle and fearful and Macbeth as headstrong and power hungry. But we must still keep in mind that the tales of these two men are fictitious.
However, fiction has always been, and will always be, created in order to showcase some kind of message. And for me, both stories show that it is truly our choices that dictate our presents and futures.In the Greek tragedy, Oedipus the King, the irony of fate brings the downfall of Oedipus.
Fate, in this story affects three specific characters. The gods have already . In Oedipus the King, by Sophocles, Oedipus and his parents try to prevent the prophecy given out by the gods, but fate still pierces through the opposition and becomes a reality. The story tells how fate cannot be prevented and everything is predetermined, just as Oedipus.
Oedipus was expelled from home and state in order to be exposed to his fate on a mountainside, Oedipus the young man expels himself from home and state and exposes himself to his fate .
The theme of Fate vs. Freewill has been around for a long time. The following clip is a short summary of the Greek play Oedipus The King: Basically, by trying to outsmart the prophecy by sending their son away, Oedipus' parents actually opened the door for their son to fulfill his fate of murdering his father and marrying his mother.
Study Guide to Bernard Knox's Introductions to Sophocles' Oedipus the King This Study Guide is directed to Bernard Knox's introductory essays to Robert Fagles' translation of the play (in the Penguin paperback edition entitled "Sophocles, The Theban Plays".There are two.
Fate, Hubris, and Hamartia in Oedipus Rex and in Helen of Troy This paper discusses the fate that doomed the character of Oedipus, the prophecies of Cassandra that were ignored and resulted in the tragic ends of Paris’ loved ones, and if the destiny of Paris could have been altered if Cassandra’s prophecies were heeded (by Jaime Cabrera, 31 Oct ).