When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
A slightly longer "nutshell" summary For the most part, Wikipedia has similar strengths and weaknesses to any other encyclopedia.
Keeps up to date well. You can ask questions. The history of an article and the process around how it was written are transparent. Articles vary wildly in Citing pages in essay and comprehensiveness. At any given moment, an article may be in a vandalized state rare, but not negligible.
Overview of Wikipedia In a wikiarticles are never "finished". They are continually edited and usually improved over time. In general this results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a fair and balanced representation of information.
Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start. Indeed, many articles start out by giving one—perhaps not particularly evenhanded—view of the subject, and it is after a long process of discussion, debate, and argument that they gradually take on a consensus form.
Others may become caught up in a heavily unbalanced viewpoint and can take some time—months perhaps—to regain a better-balanced consensus.
In part, this is because Wikipedia operates mainly on an informal process to resolve such issues.
When editors cannot agree on content and approach, it is likely to take a bit of time before more experienced editors enter the picture. Even then, on inherently controversial topics, those more experienced editors may have their own axes to grind.
The ideal Wikipedia article is balanced, neutral, and encyclopedic, containing notable verifiable knowledge. Over time, an increasing number of articles have reached this standard. However, this process can take months or years, as each user contributes in turn. Some articles contain statements and claims that have not yet been fully cited.
Others will later have entire new sections added. Some information now in the article may be considered by later contributors to be insufficiently founded and may be removed or expanded. While the overall trend is generally upward, it is not uniformly upward.
It is important to use Wikipedia carefully if it is intended to be used as a research source. Individual articles will, by the very nature of Wikipedia, vary in standard and maturity. This page is intended to help users and researchers do this effectively.
See also the article Reliability of Wikipediawhich summarizes third-party studies and assessments of Wikipedia. Notable strengths of Wikipedia Main page: Why Wikipedia is so great Wikipedia has certain advantages over other reference works.
Being web -based and having a very large number of active writers and editors, it provides fast coverage of many topics and provides hyperlinkingunavailable in traditional media. Also, it often provides access to subject matter that is otherwise inaccessible in non-native languages.
Since English Wikipedia editors come from all around the world, the relative lack of non-Western topics found in many Western publications is significantly less noticeable on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia often produces excellent articles about newsworthy events within days of their occurrence, such as the Wimbledon ChampionshipsLal Masjid siegeKidnapping of Alan Johnstonor the Benoit family tragedy.
Similarly, it is one of the few sites on the web even attempting neutral, objective, encyclopedic coverage of popular culture, including television series or science fiction. In comparison with most other web-based resources, Wikipedia's open approach tremendously increases the chances that any particular factual error or misleading statement will be promptly corrected.The Process f Research Writing Chapter 12, Citing Your Research Using MLA or APA Style, 2 Steven D.
Krause | urbanagricultureinitiative.com | Spring What You Are Citing. In-Text Citation. The entire work (or a work that has no page numbers) Include information in the text of your paper that will allow the reader to locate the source in your works cited list.
Looking for information on MLA 7th edition? Visit the MLA 7th edition guide.. Please be aware that automatically generated citations may not provide accurate results. If you choose to use a citation generator, then take the time to make the necessary corrections.
Depending on the teacher and the level of research required to complete an essay, you may be required to cite your references within the article.
To aid your citation later, write down the title of the book and the page number of any information you glean while taking notes. High school or college-level essays may. Why would you need a reword essay generator?
We reword essays and other documents for a huge variety of reasons from making them easier to read and more understandable to just ensuring that they will not trigger a copied content penalty online.
1 If you are writing an essay, or submitting a manuscript to the College of Policy Science as an undergraduate, or if you would like to submit an essay for the “Gaikokugo Sakubun Contest”.